|
Your Highlights
Scientific American liked
Andrea Gawrylewski
@AGawrylewski
The political leaders we choose have a direct impact on science. Politics conducted without evidence-based thinking--without SCIENCE--is blind at best, disastrous at worst. We, the editors, do not take this unprecedented endorsement lightly. https://t.co/nOBxq3A9McNASA JPL liked
NASA Sun & Space
@NASASun
Our Sun has entered a new cycle. A panel co-sponsored by @NOAA & @NASA has announced that the Sun's low point in activity happened in December 2019, marking the start of a new solar cycle. https://t.co/VC44pSdDJONational Geographic
@NatGeo
If you thought you knew what dinosaurs looked like, our October issue will change your mind. Writer @michaelgreshko joined @GMA this morning to discuss why 🦖 https://t.co/H0jHbT8iY2 https://t.co/HN0llk9L00Scientific American liked
Laura Helmuth
@laurahelmuth
For the first time in the 175-year history of Scientific American, we are endorsing a political candidate. Please vote for Joe Biden to support science, health, the environment, evidence-based policy, and reality over disinformation. https://t.co/XnQRR7Z6yS via @sciamThe Star
@staronline
Another cluster rises in Sabah https://t.co/mgXSY5wJRd https://t.co/mgXSY5wJRdScientific American liked
Michael E. Mann
@MichaelEMann
Never before has there been such a stark contrast between a candidate (@JoeBiden) who embraces science and one (@realDonaldTrump) who disdains and rejects it. So Scientific American. YES. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN has endorsed Joe Biden for President: https://t.co/wOEncTq77yWe sent this email to @f1shirtlady. Unsubscribe
Twitter International CompanynOne Cumberland Place, Fenian Street Dublin 2, D02 AX07 IRELAND
No comments:
Post a Comment